Non-integer order dynamic systems

ABSTRACT

A circuit implementing a non-integer order dynamic system includes a neural network that receives at least one input signal and generates therefrom at least one output signal. The input and output signals are related to each by a non-integer order integro-differential relationship through the coefficients of the neural network. A plurality of such circuits, implementing respective non-integer order controllers can be interconnected in an arrangement wherein any of the integral or differential blocks included in one of these circuits generates a signal which is fed to any of the integral or differential blocks of another circuit in the system.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention relates to dynamic systems, and more particularly to non-integer order dynamic systems such as, for example, proportional, integral, and derivative (PID) controllers.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] The idea of fractional integro-differential operators (i.e., derivatives and integrals) seems to be a somewhat unusual topic, and is very hard to explain due to the fact that, unlike commonly used differential operators, it is not related to some direct geometrical meaning, such as the trend of functions or their convexity.

[0003] A number N of first order differential equations usually model complex dynamics. In system theory, we call N the degree of the system. Moreover, the theory of Laplace transforms in linear systems provides the possibility of analyzing the input-output relationship of a system via the ratio of its Laplace transform, which is called the transfer function of the system and whose denominator is a polynomial of degree N.

[0004] For that reason, such a mathematical tool could be judged far from reality. But many physical phenomena have an intrinsic fractional order description, and fractional order calculus is necessary to explain them. In fact, some physical phenomena exist whose analysis involves transfer functions of degree m, with m being a non-integer number.

[0005] Transmission lines, various kinds of electrical noises, dielectric polarization and heat transfer phenomena are some of the fields involving non-integer order physical laws. Evidence of this is provided in the following articles: J. C. Wang, “Realization Of Generalized Warburg Impedance With RC Ladder And Transmission Lines”, J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 134, No. 8, pp. 1915-1940, 1987; M. S. Keshner, “1/f Noise”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 212-218, March 1982; B. Mandelbrot, “Some Noises With 1/f Spectrum, A Bridge Between Direct Current And White Noise”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-13, No. 2, pp. 289-298, 1967; P. Arena, R. Caponetto, L. Fortuna and D. Porto, “Nonlinear Norder Circuits And Systems: An Introduction”, Nonlinear Science, Series A, Vol. 38. World Scientific; A. Le Mehaute', “Fractal Geometries”, CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton—Ann Arbor—London, 1991; and B. Onaral, H. P. Schwan, “Linear And Non-linear Properties Of Platinum Electrode Polarization, Part I, Frequency Dependence At Very Low Frequencies” Met. Bio. Eng. Comput., vol. 20, pp. 299-306, 1982.

[0006] Following, for instance, K. B. Oldham, J. Spanier, “Fractional Calculus”, Academic Press, N.Y., 1974 or B. Ross, Editor, “Fractional Calculus And Its Applications”, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1975, the most common definition of a non-integer order integral is the following: $\begin{matrix} {\frac{^{- q}{f(t)}}{t^{- q}} = {\frac{1}{\Gamma (q)}{\int_{0}^{t}{\left( {t - \tau} \right)^{q - 1}{f(\tau)}{\tau}}}}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

[0007] The lower limit is chosen to be zero (it could be any real number) because in the following, time series with t>0 will be considered. In the above definition, Γ(q) is the factorial function defined for a positive real value q, by the following expression:

Γ(q)=∫₀ ^(∞) x ^(q−1) e ^(31 x) dx  (2)

[0008] for which, when q is an integer, it holds that:

Γ(q+1)=q!  (3)

[0009] The definition of fractional derivative easily derives from (1) by taking an n order derivative (n being a suitable integer) of an m order integral (m suitable non-integer) to obtain an n−m=q-order one: $\begin{matrix} {\frac{^{q}{f(t)}}{t^{q}} = {\frac{^{n - m}{f(t)}}{t^{n - m}} = {{\frac{^{n}}{t^{n}}\left\lbrack \frac{^{- m}{f(t)}}{t^{- m}} \right\rbrack} = {\frac{1}{\Gamma (m)}\frac{^{n}}{t^{n}}{\int_{0}^{t}{\left( {t - \tau} \right)^{m - 1}{f(\tau)}{\tau}}}}}}} & (4) \end{matrix}$

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0010] In view of the foregoing background, an object of the present invention is to provide a circuit arrangement adapted to implement non-integer order dynamic systems, such as, e.g., non-integer order PID controllers.

[0011] According to the present invention, that object is achieved by means of a system having the features set forth in the annexed claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0012] The invention will now be described, purely by way of example, with reference to the annexed drawings, wherein:

[0013]FIG. 1 shows some examples of magnitude Bode plots of fractional systems in accordance with the present invention;

[0014]FIG. 2 shows some examples of corresponding phase diagrams with respect to FIG. 1;

[0015]FIG. 3 shows the impulse response of a fractional system in accordance with the present invention;

[0016]FIG. 4 shows the step response of a fractional system in accordance with the present invention;

[0017]FIG. 5 shows a finite element of a non-inductive transmission line in accordance with the present invention;

[0018]FIG. 6 shows the circuit usually indicated as Chua's circuit in accordance with the present invention;

[0019]FIGS. 7 and 8 show respective plots of a chaotic variable in Chua's circuit with respect to FIG. 6;

[0020]FIG. 9 shows a multi-layer perceptron adapted for simulating a m-order integrator in accordance with the present invention;

[0021]FIG. 10 shows a switch configuration for a non-integer order derivative in accordance with the present invention;

[0022]FIG. 11 shows a respective signal for the learning phase with respect to FIG. 10;

[0023]FIGS. 12a-12 d respectively show various output signals used in the training of various neural networks implementing a non-integer order integro-differentiator in accordance with the present invention;

[0024]FIG. 13 shows the results of order 0.3 integration of a square wave with respect to FIG. 10;

[0025]FIGS. 14 and 15 show, by way of comparison, the representation of a classical integrator and the block scheme of a non-integer order integrator in accordance with the present invention;

[0026]FIG. 16 shows one possible implementation of the blocks shown in FIG. 15;

[0027]FIG. 17 shows a block scheme of a PID controller in accordance with the present invention;

[0028]FIGS. 18 and 19 show the possible implementation of a non-integer order PI^(λ)D^(μ) controller in accordance with the present invention;

[0029]FIG. 20 shows the connection scheme of two non-integer order PI^(λ)D^(μ) controllers in accordance with the present invention; and

[0030]FIGS. 21 and 22 show two possible implementations of some of the blocks shown in the previous figures.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0031] By way of introduction to the description of a preferred embodiment of the invention, the basic underlying theoretical principles of the invention will be briefly discussed. It is now useful to introduce the most important features of fractional systems. They will be discussed using the same tools usually adopted for integer order systems which allow an easy comparison among the two different behaviors.

[0032] For example, let us focus on Bode diagrams, that is, one of the basic tools in system and control theory. By considering the following equation: $\begin{matrix} {{F(s)} = \frac{k}{\left( {\frac{s}{p} + 1} \right)^{m}}} & (5) \end{matrix}$

[0033] and assuming s=jω, we obtain: $\begin{matrix} {{F({j\omega})} = {\left\lbrack \frac{k^{1/m}}{\left( {{{j\omega}/p} + 1} \right)} \right\rbrack^{m} = {\left\lbrack {{\frac{k^{1/m}}{\left( {{{j\omega}/p} + 1} \right)}}e^{j\quad {\phi {\lbrack\frac{k^{1/m}}{({{{j\omega}/p} + 1})}\rbrack}}}} \right\rbrack^{m} = {{\frac{k^{1/m}}{\left( {{{j\omega}/p} + 1} \right)}}^{m}e^{j\quad m\quad {\phi {\lbrack\frac{k^{1/m}}{({{{j\omega}/p} + 1})}\rbrack}}}}}}} & (6) \end{matrix}$

[0034] and, therefore the magnitude expressed in decibels is $\begin{matrix} {{{F({j\omega})}}_{dB} = {{20{\log_{10}\left\lbrack \frac{k^{1/m}}{\sqrt{{\omega^{2}/p^{2}} + 1}} \right\rbrack}^{m}} = {{20\log_{10}k} - {20m\quad \log_{10}\sqrt{{\omega^{2}/p^{2}} + 1}}}}} & (7) \end{matrix}$

[0035] It must be noted that, if ω→∞, (7) becomes −20 m log₁₀(ω/p) resulting, in a semi-logarithmic plane, in a line having slope −20 m dB/dec (instead of 20 dB/dec for first order systems). This fact is useful to plot an asymptotic diagram whose maximum error emax can be found close to the pole ω=−p. This error can be calculated as follows: $\begin{matrix} {{{e_{\max} = {{{{{F\left( {j\quad p} \right)}}_{{dB},{app}} - {{F\left( {j\quad p} \right)}}_{dB}}} = {{{{- 20}m\quad \log_{10}\frac{\omega}{p}}}_{\omega = p} - \left( {{- 20}m\quad \log_{10}\sqrt{\frac{\omega^{2}}{p^{2}} + 1}} \right)_{\omega = p}}}}} \cong {3m\quad {dB}}} & (8) \end{matrix}$

[0036] while for first order systems this value is 3 dB. Examples of magnitude Bode diagrams are reported in FIG. 1, which shows magnitude Bode plot of fractional system F(s)=1/(s+1)^(m) for m=1 (solid), m=0.5 (dashed), m=1.5 (dotted).

[0037] It is quite evident that the fractional order m modulates the slope of the magnitude diagram, providing a parameter useful, e.g., for the open loop synthesis of a controller. Regarding the phase displacement, it must be noted that, considering the exponent of expression (6), it holds that: $\begin{matrix} {{\phi \left\lbrack {F({j\omega})} \right\rbrack} = {{m\quad {\phi \left\lbrack \frac{k^{1/m}}{{{j\omega}/p} + 1} \right\rbrack}} = {{m\quad {\phi \left\lbrack \frac{1}{{{j\omega}/p} + 1} \right\rbrack}} = {{- m}\quad {arc}\quad {tg}\quad \frac{\omega}{p}}}}} & (9) \end{matrix}$

[0038] Expression (9) shows that m modulates the scale of the phase law. In fact, it can be easily seen that for ω→∞ the phase angle approaches −mp/2 instead of −p/² which is typical of first order systems. Examples of phase diagrams are depicted in FIG. 2, which shows the phase Bode plot of fractional system F(s)=1/(s+1)^(m) for m=1 (solid), m=0.5 (dashed), m=1.5 (dotted).

[0039] Let us now consider the impulse canonical responses. Taking into account the Laplace transformation, the following relations hold: $\begin{matrix} {{L\left\{ \frac{^{q}{f(t)}}{t^{q}} \right\}} = {{s^{q}L\left\{ {f(t)} \right\}} - {\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{n - 1}{s^{k}\left\lbrack \frac{^{q - 1 - k}{f(t)}}{t^{q - 1 - k}} \right\rbrack}_{t = 0}}}} & (10) \end{matrix}$

[0040] where n is an integer such that n−1<q<n. The above expression becomes very simple if all the derivatives are zero: $\begin{matrix} {{L\left\{ \frac{^{q}{f(t)}}{t^{q}} \right\}} = {s^{q}L\left\{ {f(t)} \right\}}} & (11) \end{matrix}$

[0041] Expression (11) is very useful in order to calculate the inverse Laplace transform of elementary transfer functions, such as non-integer order integrators (1/s^(q)) . In fact, replacing q with −q and considering f(t)=s(t), the Dirac impulse, by means of the definition (1), it holds that: $\begin{matrix} {{{L\left\{ \frac{t^{q - 1}}{\Gamma (q)} \right\}} = \frac{1}{s^{q}}};\quad {{L^{- 1}\left\{ \frac{1}{s^{q}} \right\}} = \frac{t^{q - 1}}{\Gamma (q)}}} & (12) \end{matrix}$

[0042] is the impulse response of a non-integer order integrator. Another important result can be derived by the well known frequency translation formula L⁻¹{F(s+a)}=e^(−at)L⁻¹{F(s)} applied to (12) $\begin{matrix} {{L^{- 1}\left\{ \frac{1}{\left( {s + a} \right)^{q}} \right\}} = \frac{t^{\quad {q - 1}}e^{{- a}\quad t}}{\Gamma (q)}} & (13) \end{matrix}$

[0043] From (13) the following expression for impulse response can be written: $\begin{matrix} {{f(t)} = {{L^{- 1}\left\{ \frac{k}{\left( {{s/p} + 1} \right)^{m}} \right\}} = {{L^{- 1}\left\{ \frac{k\quad p^{m}}{\left( {s + p} \right)^{m}} \right\}} = {k\quad p^{m}\frac{t^{m - 1}e^{{- p}\quad t}}{\Gamma (m)}}}}} & (14) \end{matrix}$

[0044] The most relevant consideration regarding (14) is that, if m<1, for t→0 f(t) is infinite, as demonstrated by FIG. 3, which shows the impulse response of a fractional system for different values of m (dashed m=0.5, solid m=1, dotted=1.5).

[0045] However it can be shown that, for any positive m, f(t) satisfies the hypothesis of Cauchy's theorem on the existence of the integral, and therefore, the step response can be calculated. If we introduce the following definition of Incomplete Gamma Function $\begin{matrix} {{\Gamma \left( {m,x} \right)} = {\int_{0}^{x}{e^{- y}y^{m - 1}{y}}}} & (15) \end{matrix}$

[0046] the step response of the fractional system in question can be expressed by the simple formula: $\begin{matrix} {{g(t)} = {{\int_{0}^{i}{{f(t)}{t}}} = {k\frac{\Gamma \left( {m,{p\quad t}} \right)}{\Gamma (m)}}}} & (16) \end{matrix}$

[0047] In FIG. 4 the step response is shown of a fractional system for different values of m (dashed m=0.5, solid m=1, dotted=1.5) . By looking at FIG. 4, a faster response of the system having m<1 can be observed. This fact, due to the infinite value of the derivative for t=0, may be successfully exploited for all those applications in which a high speed is required.

[0048] This may be the case of, e.g., applications in the areas of fast control schemes (see A. Outstaluop “Systèmes asservis lineaires d'ordre fractionnaire”, Masson, Paris, 1983) or image processing (see, e.g., P. Arena, L. Bertucco, L. Fortuna, G. Nunnari, D. Porto “CNN with Non-Integer Order Cells”, 5^(th) IEEE International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks (CNNA '98), London, Great Britain, April 1998, pp. 372-378.

[0049] During the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the use of traditional differential calculus became the fundamental tool for describing any physical phenomena we can find in nature. Complex dynamics are usually modeled by a number N of first order differential equations. However, many complex physical phenomena exist whose analysis can be successfully performed via transfer functions of degree m, with m being a non-integer number.

[0050] As shown in several of the works cited in the introductory portion of this description, transmission lines, electrical noises, dielectric polarization and heat transfer phenomena are some of the fields involving non-integer order physical laws. In the time domain, these phenomena have been modeled using differential equations of infinite order, which are not so easy to handle. In the following, some examples of non-integer order systems and relative transfer functions, which may be found when studying this kind of physical phenomena, are reported. In all of them the role of non-integer order integration is quite evident.

[0051] A first example of a non-integer order system is transmission lines. Transmission lines are currently widely used in the fields of communications and power transmission. Because of their length, Kirchhoff laws cannot be adopted when studying them. In fact, it is well known that they are a particular case of Maxwell equations only if circuit dimensions are very small with respect to the minimum wavelength of the voltages (currents) flowing through them. However, if a transmission line is subdivided into a large number of elementary circuits of lengths dz, each of them can be considered a concentrated circuit as shown in FIG. 5.

[0052] There, a finite element of length dz in a non-inductive transmission line is shown. From Kirchhoff laws and for dz→0, the following partial differential equations can be derived: $\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {\quad {\frac{\partial v}{\partial z} = {{- r}\quad i}}} \\ {\quad {\frac{\partial i}{\partial z} = {{{- g}\quad v} - {c\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}}}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (17) \end{matrix}$

[0053] These equations are easily solvable by using a Laplace transform, which reduces the problem to an ordinary differential equation. In fact, it can be demonstrated that the solutions, in the s-domain, are the following: $\begin{matrix} {{{V\left( {s,z} \right)} = {{\left\lbrack {\frac{V\left( {s,0} \right)}{2} + {\frac{I\left( {s,0} \right)}{2}\sqrt{\frac{r}{g + {s\quad c}}}}} \right\rbrack e^{{- \sqrt{r{({g + {s\quad c}})}}}z}} + {\left\lbrack {\frac{V\left( {s,0} \right)}{2} + {\frac{I\left( {s,0} \right)}{2}\sqrt{\frac{r}{g + {s\quad c}}}}} \right\rbrack e^{\sqrt{r{({g + {s\quad c}})}}z}}}}{{I\left( {s,z} \right)} = {{\left\lbrack {\frac{I\left( {s,0} \right)}{2} + {\frac{V\left( {s,0} \right)}{2}\sqrt{\frac{g + {s\quad c}}{r}}}} \right\rbrack e^{{- \sqrt{r{({g + {s\quad c}})}}}z}} + {\left\lbrack {\frac{I\left( {s,0} \right)}{2} + {\frac{V\left( {s,0} \right)}{2}\sqrt{\frac{g + {s\quad c}}{r}}}} \right\rbrack e^{\sqrt{r{({g + {s\quad c}})}}z}}}}} & (18) \end{matrix}$

[0054] The positive exponential (reflection wave term) disappears in both solutions if the input impedance of the line is the following: $\begin{matrix} {\frac{V\left( {s,0} \right)}{I\left( {s,0} \right)} = \frac{\sqrt{r}}{\sqrt{g + {s\quad c}}}} & (19) \end{matrix}$

[0055] This result, which holds even for all z (characteristic impedance of a non-inductive transmission line), shows a voltage-current relation expressed by a fractional order transfer function with one pole belonging to the generic kind $\begin{matrix} {{F(s)} = \frac{k}{\left( {\frac{s}{p} + 1} \right)^{m}}} & (20) \end{matrix}$

[0056] where k=(r/g)^(0.5), m=0.5, p=g/c.

[0057] A second example of a non-integer order system is with respect to the polarizaiton phenomena. Since dielectric mediums can be modeled as distributed parameter systems, their behavior can be analyzed in a way similar to what has been done for transmission lines. Except for metal electrodes, it can be shown that for certain kinds of noble materials (e.g., gold, silver, and platinum), the frequency polarization impedance response follows a more complex fractional order law.

[0058] Expression (20) is not adapted to describe this phenomenon and for that reason it has to be replaced by its more general form: $\begin{matrix} {{F(s)} = \frac{k}{\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\left( {\frac{s}{p_{i}} + 1} \right)^{m_{i}}}} & (21) \end{matrix}$

[0059] where n is the number of poles of the multiple-pole transfer function. Experimental results seem to suggest a small value for n, which leads to a more comfortable approximation if we use a frequency domain method. As an example, a platinum electrode, when the sinusoidal input amplitude is 65 mV, is described by the following three-pole transfer function: $\begin{matrix} {{H(s)} = \frac{1}{\left( {1 + {10000\quad s}} \right)^{0\quad 11}\left( {1 + {210s}} \right)^{0\quad 36}\left( {1 + {0.124s}} \right)^{0\quad 35}}} & (22) \end{matrix}$

[0060] Obviously, (22) can be considered as a cascade of three single poles fractional order systems and each of them may be studied separately in the frequency domain.

[0061] Numerical differintegration will now be discussed. As explained previously, the integral of definition (1) reproduced in the foregoing is not always solvable in a closed form. For this reason, a numerical approximation is needed to allow an automatic evaluation of it. Obviously, the first step starts from (1), which is rewritten as follows: $\frac{^{- q}{f(t)}}{t^{- q}} = {\frac{1}{\Gamma (q)}{\int_{0}^{t}{\left( {t - \tau} \right)^{q - 1}{f(\tau)}{\tau}}}}$

[0062] Let us divide the interval [0, t] into k subintervals, with k+1 being the number of samples of f(t) which are indicated for simplicity, in the following way: $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {f_{0} \equiv {f(0)}} \\ {f_{1} \equiv {f\left( \frac{t}{k} \right)}} \\ \cdots \\ {f_{j} \equiv {f\left( \frac{jt}{k} \right)}} \\ \cdots \\ {f_{k} \equiv {f(t)}} \end{matrix} & (23) \end{matrix}$

[0063] The integral extended to the whole interval [0, t] may be divided into the sum of k integrals: $\begin{matrix} {\frac{^{- q}{f(t)}}{t^{- q}} = {\frac{1}{\Gamma (q)}{\sum\limits_{j = 0}^{k - 1}{\int_{{jt}/k}^{{\lbrack{{jt} + t}\rbrack}/k}{\left( {t - \tau} \right)^{q - 1}{f(\tau)}{\tau}}}}}} & (24) \end{matrix}$

[0064] Assuming f to be constant inside each subinterval (for example, equal to the mean value of the two extreme samples), its value can be extracted from the integral $\begin{matrix} {{{\int_{{jt}/k}^{{\lbrack{{jt} + t}\rbrack}/k}{\left( {t - \tau} \right)^{q - 1}{f(\tau)}{\tau}}} \approx {\frac{{f\left( \frac{jt}{k} \right)} + {f\left( \frac{\left( {j + 1} \right)t}{k} \right)}}{2}{\int_{{jt}/k}^{{\lbrack{{jt} + t}\rbrack}/k}{\left( {t - \tau} \right)^{q - 1}{\tau}}}}} = {\frac{f_{j} + f_{j + 1}}{2q}\left\{ {\left\lbrack {t - \frac{jt}{k}} \right\rbrack^{q} - \left\lbrack {t - \frac{\left( {j + 1} \right)t}{k}} \right\rbrack^{q}} \right\}}} & (25) \end{matrix}$

[0065] Finally, the following formula is obtained (see also the work by Oldham and Spanier already cited in the foregoing): $\begin{matrix} {\frac{^{- q}f_{k}}{t^{- q}} = {\frac{T^{q}}{\Gamma \left( {q + 1} \right)}{\sum\limits_{j = 0}^{k - 1}{\frac{f_{j} + f_{j + 1}}{2}\left\lbrack {\left( {k - j} \right)^{q} - \left( {k - j - 1} \right)^{q}} \right\rbrack}}}} & (26) \end{matrix}$

[0066] where T is the sample time t/k, whose choice becomes relevant if q>1. It must be noted that the calculation of every value requires the availability of all the preceding samples (i.e., a theoretically infinite memory). This fact may lead to a long computation time when a lot of steps are necessary.

[0067] A non-integer order PI^(λ)D^(μ) controller versus the classical PID controller will now be discussed. A control of dynamic chaos has been obtained in a number of vastly different physical systems including electronic circuits, lasers, physiological heartbeats and chemical systems. The elimination of unstable behavior in such system is generally advantageous, as the system under study is transformed from a state of unpredictability into one of absolute regularity.

[0068] In FIG. 6, the so-called Chua circuit is shown, providing for the presence of a chaotic variable V_(R) and a differentiating circuit. The feedback signal, which is proportional to the time derivative of V_(R), continuously modulates the negative resistance value of the Chua diode R_(N).

[0069] In order to control the Chua circuit, a continuous feedback, proportional to the derivative of the chaotic signal, can be used. Using the first order derivative, the plot of chaotic variable V_(R) of the Chua circuit is as shown in FIG. 7, where the trend of the variable V_(R) in the Chua circuit with PD controller is shown.

[0070] Conversely, in FIG. 8 the plot of chaotic variable V_(R) is depicted when a derivative of order 0.7 is used. From the comparison of the two pictures, it is possible to observe that when the non-integer order PD controller has been used, there is a faster response and smaller oscillation with respect to the classical PD controller.

[0071] A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be discussed. As outlined previously prior art approaches for non-integer order circuit realization are not always very exact, due to frequency limitations and approximations error. In particular, analog design implies the realization of time varying capacitors that are usually difficult to modulate according to desired trends (see, e.g., the work edited by B. Ross already cited in the foregoing) and digital circuitry needs a large memory area to store function samples.

[0072] Conversely a neural network modeling may insure, at the same time, a good degree of approximation and the possibility, by keeping a fixed structure, of changing the integration order by a well-defined configuration of weights. Also, a hardware realization of the obtained networks can be easily designed.

[0073] As explained, e.g., in the work by Keshner referred to in the foregoing, the more integer order poles used for obtaining the desired approximation, the more accurate the approximation results. For that reason a multi-layer perceptron is chosen with a sufficiently large number of inputs in order to simulate a high order system.

[0074] The integrator according to formula (1) is adapted to be modeled by the following NARMAX equation:

y(k)=F[y(k−1), . . . , y(k−19), u(k−1), . . . , u(k−19)]  (27)

[0075] This equation can be implemented by a neural network and, as predicted in the theory of black box identification, the network in question must have 38 inputs and 1 output.

[0076] The number of neurons in the hidden layer can be set initially to 20 and then moved to 25 so the total number of weights is 950. An example structure for the network is reported in FIG. 9, which shows the multi-layer perceptron adopted for the simulation of the m-order integrator (38-25-1).

[0077] The type of integrator to be formed will now be considered. Due to expected applications in the field of control, we focus our attention on orders 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7. Furthermore, it must be noted that with a suitable combination of them, it is possible to obtain a universal integro-differentiator whose order can be changed in the range of [−1,1] by steps of 0.1. This is shown in FIG. 10 with specific reference to a switch configuration for a derivative of order 0.7.

[0078] To this aim, four different neural networks are trained with a chirp signal containing frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz (see FIG. 11) and with their m-order integrals. See FIGS. 12a-12 d, where the output signals used in the training of the four networks are shown in the four sections designated a) to b), respectively. Nineteen samples are fed back at each step. The number of learning patterns used for the training phase has been fixed to 10,000.

[0079] The neural networks thus obtained are then tested with a square wave signal at the frequency of 10 Hz. This choice has been made since a square wave is a signal with a good number of harmonics. It can be represented by the following equation: $\begin{matrix} {{u(t)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {0.9\quad} & {\quad {{n/10} < t < {{\left( {n + 1} \right)/10}\quad n\quad {even}}}} \\ {{- 0.9}\quad} & {\quad {{n/10} < t < {{\left( {n + 1} \right)/10}\quad n\quad {odd}}}} \end{matrix} \right.} & (28) \end{matrix}$

[0080] The frequencies contained in the signal are the odd ones (10, 30, 50, 70 Hz) and have appreciable amplitude until 190 Hz.

[0081] The assumption that the networks have been trained with a signal having 100 Hz, as the maximum frequency does not affect the final results. In fact, every network seems to fit quite well the expected results, and therefore, it can be concluded that they perform exactly the desired integration. Specifically, FIG. 13 shows the results of order 0.3 integration of a square wave. The output of the network (dashed) is very close to the real one (solid).

[0082] Turning now specifically to the hardware of a non-integer order integrator, a representation of a classical integrator block is given in FIG. 14, while the proposed block scheme of the non-integer controller integrator is given in FIG. 15. There, references 1 and 2 designate input and output sections of a neural network adapted to receive an input signal IS and to deliver an output signal OS, respectively.

[0083] Reference 3 designates the core of the network, while references 4 and 5 designate input/output and memory blocks, respectively. Arrows 1-3, 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-4 and 3-5 show the flow of data between the various blocks considered in the foregoing.

[0084] One possible implementation of the blocks reported in FIG. 15 is given in FIG. 16. The weights w_(j) and the bias values b_(i) (i.e., the coefficients) of the neural network, previously determined by using the back propagation algorithm, are acquired through an I/O port 4 and then stored into the memory block 5.

[0085] The input signal IS (X) is acquired and loaded into a shift register (S₁) controlled by the core 3. The core 3 control unit manages also the shift register S₂, utilized for the feedback of the output. For each input stored in the shift registers S₁ and S₂, the core reads the appropriate weights, and moves it in blocks Σ(·)i (designated 20) that calculate the input for the each neuron, according to the formula: Σ(w _(j) x_(i))+b_(i).

[0086] Using a multiplexer 21, it is possible to calculate the output for every neuron using only one sigmoidal function F(u) (block 22). Another Σ(·) block (designated 23) forms the output layer that received the input from the previous layer and the weights and bias from the core. This block calculates the neural network output OS.

[0087] An interesting application of a non-integer order integrator is a non-integer order PI^(λ)D^(μ) controller. A proportional, integral, and differential (PID) controller comprises (as shown in FIG. 17) three main blocks: an integrator 100 plus an (integral) gain 101, a derivator 102 with a corresponding (derivative) gain 103 and one proportional block 104. By properly setting the respective gains these blocks act on the input signal providing the output control variable which is obtained by an adder 105 summing the results of integration, differentiation and proportional gain.

[0088] The proposed block scheme of the neural non-integer order PID is given in FIG. 18 while one possible implementation of the blocks reported in FIG. 18 is given in FIG. 19. In these figures the same references already used in FIGS. 15 and 16 were used to designate parts or elements identical or equivalent to those already described.

[0089] Also, references 200, 202, 204 and 205 designate blocks which apply to the signals fed thereto respective integral (200), derivative (202) and proportional (204) processing. An adder generating the main output signal OS is designated 205. Transfer of data takes place along lines designated, as in the foregoing, by the references of the respective interconnected blocks separated by a hyphen.

[0090] In particular, the derivative block 202 is obtained from the integrator one 200. In fact, the non-integer order derivative is the integer order derivative of an opportune non-integer order integral (see equation (4)). In this way, it is possible to form a device that can compute both the integral and derivative, while also providing intermediate (optional) inputs/outputs as shown by D-EXT, I-EXT, OUT-D or OUT-I.

[0091] The possible relevance of such intermediate inputs/outputs will be better appreciated in the following with respect to the possible connection of several PI^(λ)D^(μ) controllers. The weights and the bias of the neural network, previously determined by using the back propagation algorithm are acquired through the I/O port 40 and then stored into the memory block 5.

[0092] As in the foregoing, the input signal IS (X) is acquired and loaded into a shift register S₁ controlled by the core. The core control unit manages also the shift registers S₂ and S₃ utilized for the feedback of the integrator and derivative outputs. For each input stored in the shift register S₁-S₃, the core 3 reads the appropriate weights and moves it in the blocks Σ(·)i 20 that calculate the input for the each neuron, according to the formula: (w _(j) x_(i))+b_(i).

[0093] Using multiplexer 21, it is possible to calculate the output for every neuron using single Sigmoidal Function F(u) (block 22). The Σ(·) block 23 (SUM_(out)) forms the output layer that received the input from the previous layer and the weights and bias from the core. This block calculates the neural network output. The output of the block 23 is sent alternatively to the S2 shift register or to the derivative block 204. The core 3 manages this switching.

[0094] Due to the fact that only one block is used to perform both the non-integer order derivative and the non-integer order integral, the core unit 3 has to load from the memory block once the data to compute the former and once the data for the latter, processing always the same input. The sum of input, its derivative and its integral, multiplied respectively by the gains K_(p), K_(d) and K_(i) (implemented by respective multiplexers designated 104, 103 and 101 for consistency with FIG. 17), gives the system output.

[0095] Two multiplexers are additionally provided, which are designated MUX1 and MUX2. By using MUX1, managed via the core, it is possible to receive, and then manage, a derivative term D-EXT computed outside, for example, a simple derivative term computed by an analogous device. In the same way by using MUX2 it is possible to manage an external integrative term I-EXT. So by using MUX1 and MUX2 signal it is possible to manage a modular architecture based on the proposed PI^(λ)D^(μ) system.

[0096] The connection scheme of two non-integer PI^(λ)D^(μ) controllers I and II is given in FIG. 20, where the same reference numerals are reproduced which were already used in FIG. 18. Finally, an example of implementation of the neuron blocks contained in a non-integer order PI^(λ)D^(μ) controller will be given. Let us consider, any of the blocks Σ(·)i and Σ(·) designated 20 and 22 in FIG. 19. They implement the following relationship: $\begin{matrix} {U_{j} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}{W_{i}*X_{i}}} + b_{j}}} & (29) \end{matrix}$

[0097] A possible way of implementing the captioned sum (in fact, a linear combination) is described by the block schemes of FIGS. 21 and 22. Specifically, the implementation of FIG. 21 provides for the presence of a product block 50 followed by a recursive adder block 51.

[0098] The advantage of this implementation is the small area requirement. In fact, in this case it is necessary only one sum block and one multiplier. The disadvantage is due to the large number of iterations and therefore, to the large number of clock cycles. Another possible implementation is the one shown in FIG. 22 providing for the presence of a plurality of multiplier blocks 501, . . . , 50N whose outputs are fed to a single non-recursive adder block 51. The output sum value of adder 51 is controlled by a bias line 52.

[0099] Advantages and disadvantages of this structure are dual with respect to the previous one. In fact, the sum is performed within few clock cycles because the operations are executed in parallel. However, this fact implies a larger area occupation. Of course, the basic principles of the invention remaining the same, the details of implementation and the embodiments may vary, without thereby departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the annexed claims. 

That which is claimed is:
 1. A circuit implementing a non-integer order dynamic system, wherein said circuit includes a neural network (1 to 5) adapted to receive at least one input signal (IS) and to generate therefrom at least one output signal (OS), said input and output signals (IS, OS) being related to each other by a non-integer order integro-differential relationship through the coefficients (w_(j), b_(i)) of said neural network (1 to 5).
 2. The circuit of claim 1, characterized in that said neural network (1 to 5) includes a memory (4) for storing said coefficients as determined by a back propagation algorithm through said neural network.
 3. The circuit of claim 1 or claim 2, characterized in that said neural network includes an input port (40) for receiving said coefficients.
 4. The circuit of any claims 1 to 3, characterized in that said neural network includes at least one input layer register (S₁) to receive said input signal (IS) and at least one adder block (20) to calculate the input of a respective neuron of the neural network based on said input signal (IS) and a respective set of coefficients (w_(j); b_(i)).
 5. The circuit of claim 4, characterized in that it includes at least one weighing function block (22) to compute the output of at least one neuron in said neural network on the basis of a respective weighing function such as a sigmoidal function.
 6. The circuit of claim 5, characterized in that set neural network includes a plurality of neurons as well as a single multiplexer circuit (22) to apply respective weighing functions to a plurality of said neurons.
 7. The circuit of any of claims 4 to 6, characterized in that it includes at least one output layer adder circuit (23) to calculate the output of said neural network (OS) from the outputs of said at least one neuron.
 8. The device of any of claims 4 to 7, characterized in that it includes at least one additional first layer shift register (S₂) for feeding the output (OS) of the neural network back to the input thereof.
 9. The circuit of any of claims 4 to 8, characterized in that the neural network (1 to 5) includes at least one neuron block to realize a linear combination of a respective input signal (x_(i)) with a set of weights (w_(i)) and bias values (b_(j)), wherein said at least one neuron block includes a single product block (50) as well as a single adder block (51) implementing said linear combination recursively over a plurality of clock cycles.
 10. The circuit of any of claims 4 to 8, characterized in that the neural network (1 to 5) includes at least one neuron block to realize a linear combination of a respective input signal (x_(i)) with a set of weights (w_(i)) and bias values (b_(j)), wherein said at least one neuron block includes a plurality (501, 502, . . . , 50 n) of product blocks implementing respective products of said input signal (xi) with given weights (w₁, w₂, . . . , w_(n)) plus a single adder block (51) simultaneously adding the results of said products and said bias values (52).
 11. The circuit according to any of the previous claims implementing a non-integer order PID controller, characterized in that said circuit includes at least one of: a proportional block (204) adapted to add (105) to said output signal (OS) an input signal component subject to a proportional weighing coefficient (K_(p)), an integral block (200) adapted to add (105) to said output signal (OS) a non-integer integral signal component subject to an integral weighing coefficient (K_(i)), said integral block having associated therewith a respective input register (S₂) for feeding the output of said integral block (200) back to the input of said neural network, and a derivative block (202) adapted to add (105) to said output signal (OS) a non-integer derivative signal component subject to a derivative weighing coefficient (K_(d)), said derivative block (204) having associated therewith a respective input register (S₃) for feeding the output of said derivative block (202) back to the input of said neural network.
 12. The circuit of claim 11, characterized in that it includes both said integral block (200) and said derivative block (202) wherein said non-integer derivative signal component is obtained as an integer order derivative of a non-integer integral signal component generated by said integral block (200).
 13. The circuit of claim 11 or claim 12, characterized in that said integral block (200) has associated an integral input port (MUX2) to manage an external integral term.
 14. The circuit of any claims 11 to 13, characterized in that said derivative block (200) has associated therewith derivative input port (MUX1) to manage an external derivative term.
 15. A dynamic system including a plurality (I,II) of circuits according to any of claims 13 or 14, whereby any of said integral (200) or derivative (202) blocks included in one of said plurality of circuits generates at least one respective output signal which is fed to any of said integral (200) or derivative (202) blocks included in another of said plurality of circuits in the dynamic system. 